When I say the word love, many things might come to mind. Thanks to the animators at Warner Brothers, you might picture someone with heart shaped pupils in their eyes, floating a foot off the ground with chirping birds flying around their head. You might conjure up the image of a little, naked angel shooting arrows at unsuspecting crushes. Maybe you immediately slunk off into the woods in the middle of a full moon night in search of a potion sure to secure that special someone's affections. Did you think of your spouse or your grandmother or a mentor or a best friend?
I think I would be safe if I said that for most people, the word love tends to evoke an emotion. Warm fuzzies in your stomach when you find yourself surrounded by good friends. Your cheeks flushing when you get a glimpse of a crush. Your heart literally skipping a beat when the love of your life is walking towards you down the aisle on your wedding day. There are a variety of emotions that we collectively lump under the umbrella of love: adoration, lust, friendship, attraction, romance, comradery. Even pity or anger can creep into the mix. We have turned love into one of the most complex, convoluted concepts known to man.
And yet, at the same time, we have diluted the meaning of love almost to the point of, well, pointlessness. We overuse the word constantly. I love your hair. I love my morning cup of coffee. I love that movie, that song, that book. Sometimes it seems like there isn't anything we don't love. Except there is plenty. I don't love the performances in that movie. I love New York City but I don't love the traffic. You're beautiful but I don't love that dress on you. The sheer number of times each day we collectively declare our love (or lack of it) highlights the fact that we have become completely disconnected from the word.
Maybe we can gain some clarity if we look at love songs. The Beatles famously declared that love is all we need. All we need for what you ask? Well, apparently everything from saving people to singing songs, but the Fab Four fails to actually define what love is much less how to solve every problem with it. Catchy tune though. Tina Turner asked what's love got to do with it? Her conclusion was that love was a throwaway emotion and not worth the heartbreak. More recently, Minski's breakthrough hit determined that her love belongs to no one but her. Granted this is a very finite sampling of just three songs, but I don't think that we'd get any kind of consensus if we dug deeper. Sometimes love is a many splendid thing and sometimes it stinks.
It almost seems as though our society is deliberately confusing us when it comes to the concept of love. By piling on layer after layer of conflicting definitions and viewpoints and feelings, love has become a dead, lifeless, four letter word. The fact that we use it so often in conjunction with inanimate objects rather than relationships hints at deep, dark (and maybe even overtly sinister) motives. No wonder a growing number of people just shrug their shoulders when the love of God is mentioned. So what does Christ have to say about all this? Turns out, plenty.
Let me start by being fairly blunt. Christ does not give us a choice of whether we want to focus on making love the entirety of our faith. Love cannot be just a starting place or an element to make our other beliefs more palatable. Love must be the place we live, our default (and only) mode. How do I know this? Jesus said so. In Matthew 22, Jesus was well into a sparring session with the religious leaders of His day. Various factions of Jewish leaders were trying (and failing) to get him to say or do something ungodly. In verse 36, a pharisee asks Him what He thinks is the greatest commandment in Jewish law.
Let's pause a moment to consider why that is such a politically charged, absolute trap of a question. As laid out in the writings of Moses, Jewish law consisted of 613 statutes, some regulating what you should do but a large chunk start with "Thou shalt not." They range from well known laws like "Thou shalt not murder" and "Thou shalt not bear false witness" to more obscure ones like "don't boil a goat in its mother's milk." (Stay with me here, don't lose focus giving in to your cravings for boiled goat meat.) As an expert in all 613 laws, the pharisee probably felt confident that, no matter what law Jesus chose as the most important, it would be easy to embarrass Him about His choice and let Him know how very, very wrong He was. You know that the pharisees had spent hours in late night sessions debating this exact topic. That pharisee was primed to pounce on Jesus' response.
So how did Jesus respond? He didn't start talking about the relative merits of each of the laws. He didn't gather a council of other teachers together to agree on an answer. He didn't hesitate or even try to buy time by restating the question. He said, "Love God." But He didn't stop there. He added that in order to love God we also had to love people. Those creations not only made in the very image of God but creatures that God has overflowing love for Himself. It's impossible to say you love God if you don't love people.
Again, Jesus could have stopped there and let that answer stand on its own. But, in my favorite part of the exchange, he made it abundantly clear what our priorities should be. Every other law, He said, hinges on those two. In other words, get love right and you will fulfill all of the law. Try to bypass love and focus on one of the other 611 laws and you will end up fulfilling none of the law. The only way to be a follower of Christ is to perfect your execution of love.
This whole love thing is a directive I often lament because, of all the laws, why did he pick the hardest one to do? It's pretty easy to not mix fabrics in a single garment or refrain from having sex with your sister (or mother or daughter or aunt; yes, that one gets uncomfortably specific, even more so than I've listed here), but to love others is decidedly less easy. What about in Matthew 5:43, when Jesus says I even have to love my enemies? How am I supposed to generate warm fuzzies over someone who is actively plotting my demise? The good news is that, at least in my interpretation, feelings are not what Christian love is all about.
Put simply, Christian love is a choice. Whoa, time out. Didn't I say a few paragraphs ago that we didn't have a choice about love? I did. We don't have a choice whether or not we act in love. But it is infinitely easier to act in love because love itself is a simple choice: Christian love is the choice to take care of someone else's needs. Where do I get this idea? Honestly, it's all over scripture.
The fact that God loves us and is actively working for our good is a theme that is repeated over and over throughout the Bible. In Philippians 4, Paul not only describes God's love for us in terms of taking care of our every need but enthusiastically says that He will provide for us in great abundance. Not only will we be good to go for as long as we live, we will have plenty of extra. Now some take verses like this and twist them into ridiculous doctrines of a "prosperity gospel," a "God wants you to be wealthy" mentality. Christ vehemently warns against trying to hoard any overflow (we'll talk more about that when we look at grace). What are we supposed to do with it then? Obviously we should mimic God's love for us and use our abundance to take care of the needs of other people. Something we can do even if we don't like other people.
Once you embrace that idea that love is a choice, it really takes all the burden out of loving everyone. There will still be people who make your skin crawl (creepy bosses, racist uncles or anyone who hates dogs all come to mind) but remember: love isn't about tolerating evil or even fulfilling someone's wants and desires. It's about making sure their needs are covered. Ensuring that people have food, clothing and shelter. That they feel safe and part of a community. And acknowledging that when Christ said love other people, he did not put a single restriction on who those other people were. Which means we cannot put any restrictions on who we love either. White people, people of color, conservatives, liberals, trans people, heterosexual people, asexual people, old farts, young bucks, romance novelists, television preachers, Fortnite players, you name it. No matter who you personally like or don't like, it has to be literally everyone.
I hear some of you saying But I don't have anything extra, everything I have is necessary to cover my own needs. For a handful of you, that might actually be true. And by handful, I do mean as many as five of you. For the vast majority of us, however, that is not true. We all have something that we can give to others. It might be money, it might be time, it might be the ability to fix a toilet or knit a scarf or bake some cookies. It might be actually seeing someone, noticing that they exist and giving them a friendly nod or smile. The early Christian church in Acts sold all their possessions and gave the proceeds to the poor. We don't all need to make such bold, drastic gestures (although if you feel called to do that, go for it!). Sometimes all love takes is moving your neighbor's trash can out to the curb for them while they are on vacation without being asked.
So here is our chaotically good task moving forward. We need to reject the confusion society constantly injects into the idea of love, reclaim the concept of Christian love as a choice to take care of others and then actively make that choice over and over and over again. If we can do this authentically and consistently (neither of which should be confused with perfectly), not only will we be infinitely better people, the world itself will not be able to remain the way it is.